Saturday, March 26, 2011

STRANGER THAN FICTION: An Independent Investigation of the True Culprits Behind 9-11 {Part 6}



{Return to Part 5}
{Return to Part 4}
{Return to Part 3}
{Return to Part 2}
{Return to Part 1}





FOXMAN'S FAMOUS FLUNKIES

Working hand in hand with the Zionist run media and the Zionist Congressional Lobby (AIPAC), is the Mossad affiliated Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Though professing to be a civil rights organization interested only in protecting individual freedom and resisting bigotry, the ADL is in reality a political attack group that specializes in destroying the careers and reputations of anyone (jews and non-jews alike) who criticizes Zionism or Israel. The ADL’s current Director Abe Foxman has declared: “Anti-Zionism is Anti-Semitism. Period.“ (
130 B)

In a furious response to the growing worldwide speculation about Zionist involvement in 9-11, Dishonest Abe added:
“When we first heard of the charge that Jews, Israel and the Mossad was responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks, most of us chuckled. But it didn't take long to realize that it was not a joking matter that it wasn't anything to laugh about. Today you can travel the Arab world, Asia, and Europe, and read in newspapers and hear on radio and TV the big hideous lie that has become a truth --that Jews bring about a situation in their interest in order to put the blame on somebody else. How classically anti-Semitic!" (130 C)

When Foxman starts raving and ranting “anti-semitism…anti-semitism”, it usually a good indication that some brave soul has struck a nerve by daring to tell the truth about the Zionist mafia. When Foxman and his gang cry “anti-semitism”, politicians and journalists tremble. The ADL not only defines “anti-Semitism”, but also tells writers and political figures what to think and who to blame for “terrorist attacks”. The list of political luminaries that Foxman carries around in his hip pocket like so many spare coins is truly impressive.

This explains FBI Director Mueller’s highly pathetic, and revealing, speech before the ADL’s 24th Annual National Leadership Conference held in May of 2002:
“I have long admired and respected the work of ADL, and I appreciate your longstanding support of the FBI. I know that under my predecessor, Louis Freeh, this partnership reached new heights. . . . I am absolutely committed to building on that relationship. We in the FBI tremendously value your perspectives and your partnership. Your insights and research into extremism are particularly helpful to us, shedding light on the changing nature of the terrorist threats facing America. Your support of hate crime and terrorist investigations, which are now front and center in the work of the FBI, is essential to us. And the training and education you provide for the FBI and for law enforcement have never been more relevant. That includes the conference on extremist and terrorist threats you are sponsoring this month at the FBI Academy.” (131 A)

Just shoot me now! The FBI is in “partnership” with the Zionist ADL and relies upon this smear group for “insights, research, education and training!

Over at the CIA, the situation isn’t much better, perhaps even worse! Just listen to CIA Director George Tenet express his love for ADL Director Abe Foxman at a dinner in Foxman’s honor:
"I searched for a Greek word that best captures the way I feel, and it suddenly came to me...The word, from ancient Greek, is 'rabbi.' …… 'rabbi' means 'my teacher,' not just 'teacher,' but 'my teacher.' And Abe, that is what you have been to me and to so many others in this room. You have...educated me about anti-Semitism and made me understand it far better than I ever did before, and like the greatest of rabbis, you just don't teach the ethical precepts of the Torah, you live them." (131 B) (emphasis added)

When you’re finished throwing up, I have more declarations of love and affection for the known criminal, slanderer, liar, and Israeli agent Foxman, issued by some of the most powerful men in America. At that same dinner, then president Bill Clinton said this:
“Abe, throughout your life you've been a guiding light ­ to the people of our nation, to the citizens of Israel, and to those fighting for peace and justice around the world." (131 C) (emphasis added)

St. Rudy the Recycler added:
"I thank Abe for the people of the City of New York, and personally, for all that he's done…” (131 D)

Future president, then Texas governor, George Bush paid his ass-kissing tribute to Foxman too:
"Throughout the years, you have prodded the conscience of the world.” (131 E)

At a 2001 ADL conference, Attorney general John Ashcroft thanked the ADL:
"I want to express personally my gratitude, my gratitude to the ADL for its assistance that it provides to us.” (131 F)

Study some of the above comments closely. “Partner”… “My rabbi” …“Guiding Light to our nation”…. “Prodder of the Conscience of the World.” Is this the language of sincere admiration? Or does it sound more like the type of exaggerated flattery that awestruck subordinates might use to please and pacify a demanding boss? Think about it.

Didn’t anyone ever tell these important public officials of ours that when the FBI raided the California offices of the ADL in 1993, they found that the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000 people across the country, and that more than 75 percent of the information had been illegally obtained from police, FBI files and state drivers license data banks? (
132) Are they not aware that the San Francisco Superior Court awarded $150,000 in court judgments against the Anti-Defamation League in connection with this FBI bust? (133)

What other group in America could get away with not only stealing FBI files (a Federal offense!), but then becoming “partners” with the FBI? What purpose would the ADL have for these files? Why would men like FBI Director Mueller, Attorney General Ashcroft, CIA Director Tenet, and Presidents Clinton and Bush disregard the fact that the ADL is a criminal group that was caught spying on US citizens by their own FBI? Why does Mueller ignore the insights of his own agents while thanking the criminal and slanderous ADL for it’s “advice“?

It’s because Mueller, Tenet, Ashcroft, Bush, Clinton, Giuliani etc. are empty, careerist “yes men” who understand that it doesn’t pay to defy the Zionist Mafia, lest Foxman and his Mossad buddies reveal some juicy little secret to the Zionist media, a secret contained in those stolen FBI files. These obedient ass-kissers are promoted and honored by the Zionist controlled media, while honest field agents like Wright, Rowley, Edmonds and Cole go nowhere!





PARTNERS IN CRIME
LEFT: THE FBI'S ROBERT MUELLER
RIGHT: THE ADL'S ABE FOXMAN





THE ANTHRAX LETTERS: ANOTHER ANTI-ARAB FRAME UP

On October 3, 2001, an Egyptian-American scientist named Dr. Ayaad Assaad sat terrified in a vault-like interrogation room at an FBI office in Washington D.C. It was not yet known that a pair of letters containing deadly anthrax had been mailed to NBC Newsman Tom Brokaw and US Senator Tom Daschle. Five people would die as a result of the anthrax mailings which had been mailed from New Jersey. Billions of pieces of mail were delayed, costing the US Post Office to suffer huge losses. The news media ran nothing but anthrax stories night and day. Politicians and commentators speculated that Osama Bin Laden or Saddam Hussein were behind the letters. Why was the FBI questioning Asaad?

Before the anthrax murders were committed, someone had sent the FBI an anonymous letter accusing Dr. Assaad of being a bio-terrorist with a grudge against the United States. (134)

The letter was sent on September 25th - before the first anthrax case was even diagnosed. The FBI agents soon were convinced that the anonymous letter was a hoax and a frame up attempt. Assaad was cleared of suspicion and released. Assaad later told The Hartford Courant of Connecticut:

'“I was so angry when I read the letter, I broke out in tears. Whoever this person is knew in advance what was going to happen and created a suitable, well-fitted scapegoat for this action. You do not need to be a Nobel Laureate to put two and two together." (135)


If we find out who would have wanted to frame Dr. Assad in particular, and Arabs in general, we will likely find out who was behind the anthrax murders. That the wording of the anthrax letters was contrived in such a manner as to frame Arabs/Muslims is so self evident that even a mentally retarded child could see through it. Here is the wording of the Daschle letter:

"You cannot stop us. We have this anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid? Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." (136)…….


and the Brokaw letter:

"This is next. Take Penacilin now. Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." (137)


Give me a break!!!!!!!!! Ask yourself. Who would want to frame Arabs? Who would want to link the interests of the US and the interests of Israel in the obvious way these ridiculous letters attempt to? Remember the Lavon Affair? Remember the USS Liberty? Remember the dancing Israelis? Remember Netanyahu's saying 9-11 was good for US-Israeli relations?

A good place to start searching would be the US bio-weapons lab at Fort Detrick, MD. The Ames strain of anthrax has in fact been traced to Fort Detrick, where Assaad once worked until he was laid off in 1997. After he was let go from Fort Detrick, Assaad filed a federal discrimination suit based upon the brutal abuse and harassment that he had endured from some highly suspicious co-workers. In 1991, Assaad found an 8 page poem in his mailbox which became a courtroom exhibit. The poem had 235 lines, many of them lewd and sexually explicit, mocking Assaad. Along with the poem, the perpetrators left Assaad a rubber camel with a large penis attached to it. (138) This was an obvious attempt to mock Assaad’s Arab ethnicity. Assaad said that when he brought the poem to the attention of his supervisor, Col. David Franz, Franz kicked him out of his office! (139) Now these weren’t immature college kids doing this. This outrageous emotional abuse was carried out by highly trained scientists who obviously wanted Aassad out.

One of the scientists known to have been a leader in the horrible attacks on Dr. Assaad was Dr. Lt. Col. Philip Zack. Philip Zack was to "voluntarily" leave Fort Detrick shortly after Assaad brought Zack’s poem and camel to the attention of his supervisors. (140) Strike one on Dr. Zack!

In an completely unrelated matter, another Fort Detrick researcher, Dr. Mary Beth Downs told army investigators that on several occasions in January and February of 1992, she had come to work several times to discover that someone had been conducting anthrax research after hours. (141)

Who could that have been? Documents from that 1992 inquiry confirm that an unauthorized person was observed on a surveillance camera being let into the lab at 8:40 PM on January 23, 1992. Who was this unauthorized person caught sneaking into the bio-weapons lab, during the same time period that anthrax research was being done after hours? None other than Lt. Col. Philip Zack! (142) The same Zack who was forced to resign a year earlier because of his horrible abuse of Dr. Assaad. Strike two on Dr. Zack!

Why would Dr. Zack and others have such an animosity towards Dr. Assaad? What would motivate him to help write a 235 line hate poem? What motive would he have to frame Arabs for the deadly anthrax murders? Well, some research into the name "Zack" reveals that it is a fairly common jewish surname, derived from the Old Testament "Zacharias". Dr. Zack is jewish, and given his obvious, fanatical hatred of Arabs - we can safely deduce that he is a hard core Zionist. Strike three on Dr. Zack!

All of the above is public information. Assaad's 1990's legal proceedings, Dr. Down's testimony, the surveillance video of Zack sneaking into Fort Detrick one year after he had "resigned"- it's all there. The Hartford Courant exposed all of these facts (143) as did the Toronto Globe and Mail, (144) the Seattle Times, (145) and other publications. Just the facts contained in Hartford Courant story alone should be enough to at least indict Philip Zack. So why didn't we see Dr. Zack's face on our TV screens? Why hasn’t Dr. Zack been given a lie detector test? What forces in the media and the government are protecting Zack from being exposed as the logical prime suspect?

The plot thickens (and sickens) even more. It is not my intent to smear, defame, or offend jewish people here. But to not mention the ethnicity of certain players in this fantastic drama would be like writing an expose on the Italian Mafia without mentioning that it's major players are Italians. Remember, some of the Zionists’ harshest critics are themselves jewish.

Dr. Assaad had been cleared and Dr. Zack was coming under a small amount of media and FBI suspicion. Enter, from stage left, one Barbara Rosenberg, a jewish environmentalist professor and political activist with no expertise in bio-warfare. (146) Rosenberg suddenly went public with the claim that she knew who the anthrax killer was. (147) She was supported in this effort by another Zionist New York Times journalist named Nicholas D. Kristof, who openly called for the arrest of Hatfill! (148)

Quietly and behind the scenes, Rosenberg began directing investigators towards an American scientist named Dr.Stephen Hatfill (and therefore away from Dr. Zack). The Washington Post confirmed that it was Rosenberg who helped put authorities on the trail of the innocent Dr. Hatfill. (149)

The name of Hatfill trickled forth from the news media. In a matter of weeks, the trickle became a media flood. Dr. Hatfill became a household name. Hatfill called a news conference to protest his innocence. There is not a shred of evidence against him and he passed an FBI lie detector test. (150) But the Zionist controlled media lynch mob, led by the evil Rosenberg and the yellow journalist Kristoff, continued to pursue and harass Hatfill. Dr.Hatfill may never be imprisoned, but his life and career have been destroyed by these false allegations and the media hype. Lt. Col. Zack is off the hook.

What these mad Zionist scientists and their media brethren have done to Dr. Assaad and Dr. Hatfill is monstrous beyond belief. It is clear that these anthrax letters were first intended to be an anti-Arab frame up with Assaad meant to take the blame. When that didn't work, these fanatical Zionists (who always stick together like glue!) put the media and the FBI on poor Dr. Hatfill‘s back, and wrecked his career and reputation in the process. Why hasn’t Dr. Zack been given an FBI lie detector test???? Ask FBI boss and ADL’ “partner” ; Robert Mueller!




LEFT: THE ANTHRAX LETTERS, AN OBVIOUS FRAME UP ATTEMPT
RIGHT: ZIONIST WRITER KRISTOFF, AN EVIL LIAR WHO TRIED TO FRAME AN INNOCENT MAN.





HUNDREDS OF MOSSAD AGENTS RUNNING WILD IN AMERICA!

We talked at length about the five Israeli "movers", i.e. Mossad agents, who were arrested and placed in solitary confinement after they were caught celebrating the 9-11 horror show. We also reviewed how the Israeli owner of Urban Moving Systems - Dominick Suter - then suddenly abandoned his “moving company” and fled for Israel on 9-14. But there were still more Israeli "movers" in America whose actions raise serious suspicions.

In October of 2001, three more Israeli "movers" were stopped in Plymouth, PA because of their suspicious behavior. These "movers" were seen dumping furniture near a restaurant dumpster! When the restaurant manager approached the driver, a "Middle Eastern" man later identified as Moshe Elmakias fled the scene (151). The manager made note of the truck's sign which read "Moving Systems Incorporated" and called the police. When the police spotted the truck, two other Israelis - Ayelet Reisler and Ron Katar began acting suspiciously (152). The Plymouth police searched the truck and found a video. The Israelis were taken into custody and the video tape was played at the police station. The video revealed footage of Chicago with zoomed in shots of the Sears Tower (153). The police quickly alerted the FBI and it was also discovered that the Israelis had falsified travel logs and phony paperwork on them (154). They were also unable to provide a name and telephone number for the customer that they claimed to have been working for. These Israelis were up to some sort of dirty business, and you can be sure it had nothing to do with moving furniture.

On October 10, 2001, CNN made a brief mention of a foiled terrorist bomb plot in the Mexican Parliament building. They promised to bring any further developments of this story to their viewers, but the incident was never heard of again in America. But the story appeared in bold headlines on the front page of the major Mexican newspapers (155) and was also posted on the official website of the Mexican Justice Department (156). Two terrorist suspects were apprehended in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies. Caught red-handed, they had in their possession a high powered gun, nine hand grenades, and C-4 plastic explosives (great stuff for demolishing buildings!) (157) Within days, this blockbuster story not only disappeared from the Mexican press, but the terrorists were released and deported! The two terrorists were Salvador Gerson Sunke and Sar ben Zui. Can you guess what their ethnicity was? Grson Sunke was a Mexican jew and Zui was a colonel with the Israeli special forces. (158) Can you say "Mossad?" The story in El Diario de Mexico went on to reveal that the Zionist terrorists had fake Pakistani passports on them. (159) Can you say "false flag operation?" The probable motive of this particular botched terrorist operation was to involve oil rich Mexico in the "War on Terrorism". (The War on Israel's enemies would be a more accurate description). Mexico is no military power, but the psychological trauma of an "Arab" attack on Mexico would surely have induced Mexico to provide unlimited cheap oil to her American "protector". With cheap oil flowing to America at rock bottom prices from Mexico, the US could better afford to break off relations with the oil rich Arabs in general and Saudi Arabia in particular. That‘s why the conspiracy chose so many Saudi identities to steal for the 9-11 operation.

In November of 2001, 6 more suspicious Israelis were detained in an unspecified mid-eastern state. They had in their possession box cutters, oil pipeline plans, and nuclear power plant plans. (160) The local police called in the Feds and Immigration officials took over the scene and released the men without calling the FBI. The Jerusalem Post, (161) the Miami Herald, (162) and the Times of London (163) all carried this amazing story and all revealed how furious FBI officials were that these suspects with nuclear power plant plans were allowed to go free. Of course, the corruption riddled FBI would only have caved into Zionist pressure from the Justice Department’s Criminal Division boss, Michael Chertoff, and also from the ADL’s “partner”, FBI boss Robert Mueller - who would no doubt have found a way to release those Israeli terror suspects too.

In December, 2001, the Los Angeles Times published the story of how two jewish terrorists were arrested by the FBI for plotting to blow up the office of US Congressman of Arab descent - Darrell Issa (R-CA), and a California mosque. (164) Irv Rubin and Earl Kruger of the Jewish Defense League (JDL) were charged with conspiracy to destroy a building by means of explosives. This story got brief national coverage but quickly disappeared too. These Zionists sure love blowing up buildings and killing innocent people don't they?

In May of 2002, yet another moving van was pulled over in Oak Harbor, Washington near the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station. Fox News reported that the van was pulled over for speeding shortly after midnight. The passengers told the police they were delivering furniture, but because it was so late at night, the police weren't buying the story. A bomb sniffing dog was brought in and the dog detected the presence of TNT and RDX plastic explosives in the truck (great stuff for demolishing buildings!) Both Fox News (165) and the Ha'aretz newspaper of Israel (166) reported that the two "movers" were Israelis.

According to FOX news, throughout late 2000 and 2001, a total of 200 Israeli spies were arrested. (167) It was the largest spy ring to be uncovered in the history of the US. The Washington Post also reported that some of these Israelis were arrested in connection with the 9-11 investigation. (168) US. Carl Cameron of FOX News Channel did a excellent four part, nationally televised, series of investigations into this blockbuster scandal. But FOX pulled the investigative series after Zionist groups complained to FOX executives. FOX even went so far as to remove the written transcripts of the series from its website! In it’s place was posted a chilling, Orwellian message which reads: "This story no longer exists." (169) Fortunately for the sake of history, the FOX transcripts were copied onto to many other websites and all four parts are available for your review. (see footnotes.)

The FOX series and other mainstream news media sources revealed that many of these Israelis were army veterans with electronics and explosives expertise. Many of them failed lie detector tests. FBI agents told FOX that some of their past investigations were compromised because suspects had been tipped off by Israeli wiretapping specialists. It was discovered that Israeli companies such as Comverse and Amdocs have the capability to tap American telephones (great for blackmailing all those wife-cheating politicians!) FBI agents also told FOX they believed the Israelis had advance knowledge of the 9-11 attacks. (which certainly would explain why no Israelis died in the WTC) Still another US official informed FOX that some of the detained Israelis actually had links to 9-11, but he refused to describe the nature of those links. The FBI official told FOX's Carl Cameron:

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about the evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information." (170)


Then there was that small army of Israeli "art students" who were arrested for trying to sneak into secured US Federal buildings and staking out 36 Department of Defense sites. Some of these suspicious “art students” even showed up at the homes of Federal employees. (171) Ron Hatchett, a Department of Defense analyst, told Channel 11, KHOU news in Houston that he believed that the “art students” were gathering intelligence for future attacks. Here’s an excerpt from the October 1, 2001 KHOU investigative report by Anna Werner:

“Could federal buildings in Houston and other cities be under surveillance by foreign groups? That's what some experts are asking after federal law enforcement and security officials - nationally and in Houston - described for the 11 News Defenders a curious pattern of behavior by a group of people claiming to be Israeli art students.”

“Hatchett says they could be doing what he would be doing if he were a terrorist, sizing up the situation: "We need to know what are the entrances to this particular building. We need to know what are the surveillance cameras that are operating. We need to know how many guards are at this operation, when do they take breaks?" Says Hatchett: This is not a bunch of kids selling artwork."

“A former Defense Department analyst, Hatchett believes groups may be gathering intelligence for possible future attacks. "Some organization, thinking in terms of a potential retaliation against the U.S. government could be scouting out potential targets and … looking for targets that would be vulnerable."


And a source tells the Defenders of another federal memo, stating that besides Houston and Dallas, the same thing has happened at sites in New York, Florida, and six other states, and even more worrisome, at 36 sensitive Department of Defense sites.

"One defense site you can explain," says Hatchett, "well that was just a serendipitous, …….. Thirty-six? That's a pattern." (172)


A Federal memo stated that these art students may have had ties to an "Islamic terror group". (173) Remember the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946, and how the "Arab terrorists" were actually Irgun terrorists? Remember the Zionist terrorists caught in Mexico with Arab passports? remember the official motto of the Mossad - By Way of Deception Thou Shalt Do War. Are you getting the picture? Can you say "false flag operations."?

Before his excellent work was silenced, FOX's Cameron reported this amazing bit of information:

"Investigators within the DEA, INS, and FBI have all told FOX News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying is considered career suicide." (174) (emphasis added)


Did you catch that? If an investigator dares to mention Israeli spying, he has committed career suicide! And if a journalist like FOX's Cameron dares to bring this scandal to light, he is told to shut his mouth. If they persist, they may even be called "anti-Semitic" - a label which has served as the kiss of death for many a career. This means that Zionist Mafia can do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, and however it wants - including orchestrating, financing, executing, and covering up the true story of events in the Middle East, the 9-11 massacre, and the ensuing "War on Terrorism" (war on Israel's enemies).

Now do you remember the Mossad's "warning" about the 200 "Al-Qaeda terrorists" said to have been preparing major attacks in the US? (175) At the time of this writing, we are one year into the largest investigation in American history, and not one of these 200 "terrorists" has yet to be uncovered. (176) But 200 Israeli spies were uncovered, among them many military members, electronics experts, wiretapping and phone tapping specialists, and explosives experts with the skill to bring down tall buildings. (177) Logic and common sense leads to the conclusion that the "200 Al Qaeda terrorists" were in reality, 200 Zionist terrorists sent to frame the Arabs for terrorist attacks and drag America into a war. History repeats itself. But who will teach this history to the American people when the Zionists control the information industry? The Zionist Mafia and their ass-kissing careerist henchmen in media, government, academia, and business have all of the bases covered.





LEFT: FRONT PAGE OF EL DIARIO DE MEXICO SHOWS ISRAELI TERRORISTS BEING ESCORTED OUT OF MEXICAN PARLIAMENT BUILDING
RIGHT: FOX NEWS ALERT TELEVISED REPORT OF TWO ISRAELI "MOVERS" ARRESTED IN WASHINGTON STATE. EXPLSOVES RESIDUE DETECTED IN MOVING VAN.





{Go to Part 7}
{Return to Part 5}
{Return to Part 4}
{Return to Part 3}
{Return to Part 2}
{Return to Part 1}

Saturday, March 12, 2011

"Flight 93" that crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania may have been shot down



"Flight 93" crash site near Shanksville, Pennsylvania




The official story on Flight 93 is that it crashed (and was not shot down) in Shanksville, Pennsylvania as the passengers heroically attempted to take back control over the plane from the "hijackers". There are problems with this claim as well, and many questions that need to be answered. Evidence indicates that Flight 93 may have been shot down. It is also questionable whether what crashed in Shanksville was really a commercial airliner, because the supposed crash site does not have debri and wreckage consistent with a commercial airliner crash, and was essentially just a hole in the ground.





Debri from Flight 93 found miles away from main crash site:


Investigators locate 'black box' from Flight 93; widen search area in Somerset crash

Thursday, September 13, 2001

By Tom Gibb, James O'Toole and Cindi Lash, Post-Gazette Staff Writers

[...]

Finding the flight data recorder had been the focus of investigators as they widened their search area today following the discoveries of more debris, including what appeared to be human remains, miles from the point of impact at a reclaimed coal mine.

Residents and workers at businesses outside Shanksville, Somerset County, reported discovering clothing, books, papers and what appeared to be human remains. Some residents said they collected bags-full of items to be turned over to investigators. Others reported what appeared to be crash debris floating in Indian Lake, nearly six miles from the immediate crash scene.

[...]


http://post-gazette.com/headlines/20010913somersetp3.asp







Eyewitnesses hear "booms" before the aircraft went down:


Day of Terror: Outside tiny Shanksville, a fourth deadly stroke

Wednesday, September 12, 2001

[...]

Some witnesses reported that the plane was flying upside down for a time before the crash; others said they heard up to three loud booms before the jetliner went down.

[...]


http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010912crashnat2p2.asp







Eyewitnesses see military plane flying near "Flight 93" when it crashed:


Was United Flight 93 shot down on Sept. 11?

Report revisits nagging question of what really happened to doomed jet


January 25, 2003
© 2011 WorldNetDaily.com


[...]

Echoing reports made immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, several eyewitnesses claim in a report by London's Daily Mirror that they saw a "military-type" plane flying around United Airlines Flight 93 when the hijacked passenger jet crashed in rural Pennsylvania -- prompting the unthinkable question of whether the U.S. military shot down the plane.

[...]

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30682







Many local residents of Shanksville believe Flight 93 was shot down; eyewitnesses see no evidence of plane wreckage at crash site:


9-11 Mysteries Remain

Three Years After Terror Attacks, Public Still Doubts ‘Official’ Story


By Christopher Bollyn

[...]

American Free Press visited Somerset County to look into some of the questions surrounding United Airlines Flight 93, which allegedly turned over and crashed in a refilled strip mine between Lambertsville and Shanksville, Pa., taking 44 lives with it.

Many local residents believe the plane was shot down, which they say would explain why parts of the plane and its contents were found strewn over a large area.

One question, “is what happened to the physical wreckage of the plane?”

“There was no plane,” Ernie Stull, mayor of Shanksville, told German television in March 2003
:

[...]

“They had been sent here because of a crash,
but there was no plane?” the reporter asked.

“No. Nothing. Only this hole.”


When AFP asked Stull about his comments, he disagreed about when he had gone to the crash site. “A day or two later,” Stull said, was about when he went to the site. But he reiterated the fact that they saw little evidence of a plane crash.

Nena Lensbouer, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, was the first person to go up to the smoking crater.

Lensbouer told AFP that the hole was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described hearing “an explosion, like an atomic bomb”—not a crash.

Lensbouer called 911 and stayed on the line as she ran across the reclaimed land of the former strip mine to within 15 feet of the smoking crater.

Lensbouer told AFP that she did not see any evidence of a plane then or at any time during the excavation at the site, an effort that reportedly recovered 95 percent of the plane and 10 percent of the human remains.

[...]


http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/9-11_mysteries.html








U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says Flight 93 was 'shot down':


Rumsfeld says 9-11 plane 'shot down' in Pennsylvania

During surprise Christmas Eve trip, defense secretary contradicts official story


December 27, 2004
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com


WASHINGTON – Ever since Sept. 11, 2001, there have been questions about Flight 93, the ill-fated plane that crashed in the rural fields of Pennsylvania.

The official story has been that passengers on the United Airlines flight rushed the hijackers in an effort to prevent them from crashing the plane into a strategic target – possibly the U.S. Capitol.

During his surprise Christmas Eve trip to Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld referred to the flight being shot down – long a suspicion because of the danger the flight posed to Washington landmarks and population centers.

Was it a slip of the tongue? Was it an error? Or was it the truth, finally being dropped on the public more than three years after the tragedy of the terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000?

Here's what Rumsfeld said Friday: "I think all of us have a sense if we imagine the kind of world we would face if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon, the people who cut off peoples' heads on television to intimidate, to frighten – indeed the word 'terrorized' is just that. Its purpose is to terrorize, to alter behavior, to make people be something other than that which they want to be."

Several eyewitnesses to the crash claim they saw a "military-type" plane flying around United Airlines Flight 93 when the hijacked passenger jet crashed – prompting the once-unthinkable question of whether the U.S. military shot down the plane.

Although the onboard struggle between hijackers and passengers – immortalized by the courageous "Let's roll" call to action by Todd Beamer – became one of the enduring memories of that disastrous day, the actual cause of Flight 93's crash, of the four hijacked airliners, remains the most unclear.

Several residents in and around Shanksville, Pa., describing the crash as they saw it, claim to have seen a second plane – an unmarked military-style jet.

Well-founded uncertainty as to just what happened to Flight 93 is nothing new. Just three days after the worst terrorist attack in American history, on Sept. 14, 2001, The (Bergen County, N.J.) Record newspaper reported that five eyewitnesses reported seeing a second plane at the Flight 93 crash site.

[...]

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42112


Friday, March 11, 2011

STRANGER THAN FICTION: An Independent Investigation of the True Culprits Behind 9-11 {Part 5}



{Return to Part 4}
{Return to Part 3}
{Return to Part 2}
{Return to Part 1}





THE MIRACLE OF PASSOVER

Not just Americans were murdered on 9-11. Nearly 500 foreign nationals from over 80 different nations were killed in the World Trade Center. (
108) As a center of world trade and finance this is not surprising. It is also commonly known that many Israelis work in the field of international trade and finance. The laws of probability dictate that among the nearly 500 dead foreign nationals, from over 80 different nations, there should have been a considerable number of Israelis. But the number of Israeli dead was suspiciously low, especially when we consider the report, contained in the September 12 Jerusalem Post, that the Israeli embassy in America was bombarded on 9-11 with calls from 4000 worried Israeli families. (109) George Bush had told the US Congress that he also mourned the deaths of foreign citizens including "more than 130 Israelis". (110) But Bush was either misinformed or he was lying. The actual number of Israeli dead at the WTC was far less than 130. It was far less than 100. It was far less than 50. It was far less than 25. It was far less than 10. It was……. zero! (111 A) (111 B), NY Times, September 22, 2001) That's right! Zero Israeli nationals lost their lives in the WTC* while citizens from over 80 different nations, including such powerhouses of world trade and finance as Granada, Bermuda, Ireland, and the Philippines, all lost people in the WTC.
*(One Israeli was killed aboard each of the flights that crashed into the WTC. None were killed in the WTC.)
We learned earlier about the employees of the Israeli instant messaging company Odigo, who were anonymously informed of the attacks two hours before they took place. (112) Even more intriguing than the Odigo warnings was the narrow escape of 200 employees of an Israeli government run company called Zim Israel Navigational. With over 80 vessels, Zim Navigational is the 9th largest shipping company in the world. Just one week before 9-11, Zim Navigational moved out of its World Trade Center offices with over 200 workers. (113 A), (113 B)

Company spokesperson Dan Nadler said: "When we watched the pictures, we felt so lucky. Our entire US operations were run out of the 16th floor." (
114 A), (114 B) Zim moved to Virginia. Nadler added that the aim of the sudden move "was to save on rent". (115 A), (115 B) Somehow the claim that a major global shipping firm, backed up by government money, needed to save a few bucks on rent lacks credibility. And oh what perfect timing!

So who tipped off Zim? Who tipped off Odigo? Who tipped off those Pentagon officials? Who tipped off those Israeli workers in New York? I think it's safe to say it wasn't Osama Bin Laden from his cave in Afghanistan!



LEFT: BUSH COMMEMORATES 9-11 AT A DECEMBER 11 WHITE HOUSE CEREMONY. ISRAELI FLAG WAS USED AS HIS PROP.
RIGHT: ZIM NAVIGATIONAL MOVED OUT OF WTC 1 WEEK BEFORE 9-11. ZIM CLAIMS IT COULDN'T AFORD WTC RENT!




FRAMING BIN LADEN

Within minutes after the attack, a parade of politicians and "terrorism experts" appeared on every TV channel all claiming that the attacks were the work of Osama Bin Laden. A traumatized American public swallowed it all hook, line, and sinker, just like the real perpetrators knew we would. The Bush administration claimed that it had evidence linking Bin Laden to the attacks which it would release to the public in a matter of days. They never did. Just like they never provided any evidence that Al Qaeda blew up the US embassies in Africa in 1997. The entire case against Osama Bin Laden was based on nothing but the repeated claim that he was the culprit for the embassy bombings and for 9-11. It was a mass brainwash job from the very start. Demands were placed upon the Taleban government of Afghanistan turn Bin Laden over to the US or face an attack (we established earlier that US military action had already been planned since June). (
116 A) , (116 B) The Taleban offered to turn Bin Laden over to a neutral party if the US provided any evidence to them that he had anything to do with the 1997 US African embassy bombings or the 9-11 attacks. The evidence was never presented to the Taleban for two reasons:
1. There was never any evidence, not even circumstantial
2. The war to replace the Taleban with a US puppet government was already in motion. The 9-11 attacks served as the perfect excuse, the “incident” to win the support of the American people and kick off the war.

Three months after the attacks, and with the bombing of Afghani peasants in full swing, the US had still not provided one shred of evidence to link Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda "network" to 9-11. People in foreign countries were beginning to ask questions. Then one day, the Pentagon claimed that some unnamed source found a video tape in Afghanistan. The Bush gang began dropping hints in the media that this video shows Osama Bin Laden bragging and admitting his role in the attacks. How convenient! And how improbable. The "mastermind" of 9-11, who was so brilliant that he pulled off 9-11 without being detected, was careless enough to leave a "confession video" laying around to be discovered by the US!

The video was shown on the news with English subtitles. Bin Laden's voice was so barely audible that even viewers in Arab nations had to rely on the Pentagon’s translated subtitles! An obedient American (Zionist) news media accepted the Pentagon story and translation without question. A few Arab media whores were even trotted out to vouch for the tape’s authenticity. Aha! This is the "smoking gun" they assured us. But this too is another vicious lie.

On December 20, 2001, the German TV show Monitor (the "60 Minutes of Germany“) found the translation of the "confession" video to be not only “inaccurate“, but even "manipulative“. (
117) Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini and Professor Gernot Rotter made an independent translation and accused the White House translators of "writing a lot of things that they wanted to hear but cannot be heard on the tape no matter how many times you listen to it." (118)

Even more compelling than the revelations of the European press are the actual images of the "confession video". Every photo previously taken of Osama Bin laden shows gaunt facial features and a long thin nose. The Pentagon video of Bin Laden clearly shows a man with full facial features and a wide nose. Examine the pictures side-by-side for yourself if you don't believe it. The differences in facial features will jump right out at you. (
119)

Would the Pentagon leadership be capable of such deception? Why not?! They were capable of allowing 9-11 to happen weren't they? The Pentagon itself has even admitted the existence of a special department established for the purpose of planting false stories in the media in order to carry out strategic objectives. The very Zionist and very pro-war New York Times broke a story in February 2002 which revealed that the Pentagon has plans to deliberately provide false stories to the press as part of an effort to influence policy. The Pentagon set up the Office of Strategic Influence (OSI) for this purpose. A Zionist Air Force General named Simon P. Worden was chosen to head this criminal effort. (
120) Worden's boss is Douglass Feith, another dedicated Zionist who serves as Undersecretary of Defense for Policy. How dedicated of a Zionist is Feith? The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) honored Feith and his father at an award dinner in 1999. So I’ll let ZOA’s 1997 press release you about Feith:
“This year's honorees will be Dalck Feith and Douglas J. Feith, the noted Jewish philanthropists and pro-Israel activists. Dalck Feith will receive the ZOA's special Centennial Award at the dinner, for his lifetime of service to Israel and the Jewish people. His son Douglas J. Feith, the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, will receive the prestigious Louis D. Brandeis Award at the dinner.” (121 A)

There you have it! The Zionist Air Force General who runs the Pentagon’s media disinformation department, reports directly to a Zionist Pentagon boss who was a recipient of the “prestigious” Louis Brandeis Award. Brandeis, a former Supreme Court judge, was one of the key Zionist powerbrokers who helped influence Woodrow Wilson into joining World War I as part of the Zionist-British Balfour deal we learned about earlier. Remember that the next time some new “video” or “tape” that seems to implicate Muslims surfaces out of nowhere.

The most mind boggling, ridiculous, and yet scariest part of this story is that General Worden later went on to tell a US Congressional committee that an asteroid might one day hit Pakistan and be mistaken for a nuclear bomb, thus triggering a nuclear war between Muslim Pakistan and pro-Israeli India! Behold this bit of brazen bullshit from admitted liar Worden, courtesy of CNN:
“An asteroid 5 to 10 meters in diameter exploded in June over the Mediterranean Sea, releasing as much energy as the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in World War II, Worden told the House Committee on Science. "Imagine that the bright flash accompanied by a damaging shock wave had occurred over India or Pakistan.” (121 B)

Worden noted that at the time the two countries were near the brink of war and that either could have mistaken it for a surprise attack. Wouldn’t that be convenient for the Pakistan-hating Zionists!

One year has passed since the 9-11 attacks and the FBI has not uncovered any Al Qaeda cells in the United States nor has it found any paper trail. The London Times reported:
"Thousands of FBI agents have rounded up more than 1,300 suspects across America since September 11, but they have failed to find a single Al-Qaeda cell operating in the United States...Tom Ridge, Director of Homeland Security could not explain why none had been caught." (122)

In April of 2002, FBI director Robert Mueller - the same Robert Mueller who admitted that several hijacker identities were in doubt due to identity thefts- made this stunning announcement:
"In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." (123)

Predictably, Directors Ridge and Mueller attribute this total lack of any evidence to the skill of the Al - Qaeda "terrorist network". If you've read this far you should know better. The reason that the US has been unable to uncover a shred of evidence to link Al Qaeda to 9-11 is because....Al Qaeda didn't do it!



WILL THE REAL OSAMA BIN LADEN PLEASE STAND UP?
LEFT: PENTAGON'S "CONFESSION" VIDEO BIN LADEN
RIGHT: KNOWN IMAGE OF BIN LADEN




WHISTLEBLOWERS. WHISTLEBLOWERS. WHISTLEBLOWERS.
THE FBI AGENTS WHO TRIED TO PREVENT 9-11


The FBI's field agents are "the good guys". It's the ass kissing, spineless careerists at the top who have corrupted the agency. In the critical weeks and months leading up to that fateful day, numerous clues were picked up by loyal FBI field agents. Some of these agents were so alarmed at what they thought was an unfolding terror plot, that they tried to convince their superiors to investigate deeper. These agents were either ignored, threatened, or fired.

Each of these FBI agents thought that they were on the trail of an Arab terror plot and unless they've read this paper, they probably still believe so. We can forgive them their ignorance if they haven't realized yet that the trail they were on was not that of Arab terrorists, but rather Mossad agents impersonating Arab terrorists. (much more on that later!) The essential point is that these agents were on to something big that someone didn't want them to digging into.

There is FBI Special Agent Robert Wright. The public interest law firm Judicial Watch is representing agent Wright. Wright claims that he was met with retaliation and threats from his bosses and from the Justice Department who told him they wanted his probes to go no further. (
124) Wright maintains that if his investigation had been allowed to continue, the attacks could have been prevented.

There is FBI agent Coleen Rowley. The gutsy Rowley wrote a 13 page letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller in which she actually accuses the director of her own agency of "a subtle skewing of the facts". (
125) Rowley's letter also charged that the agency refused to react to evidence of a pending terror plot. According to Rowley the FBI's obstruction was so blatant that her and some of her fellow agents jokingly speculated that key FBI personnel must have been moles working for Osama Bin laden! (126) Rowley’s main point of contention was the agency’s failure to go after Zacharias Moussoui, the “20th hijacker”, even after his flight school instructor reported his suspicious behavior to the FBI. Moussoui you will recall was the French Algerian who couldn’t speak French to his flight school instructor.

There is FBI agent Sibel Edmonds. Edmunds was an FBI wiretap translator. She claims that another FBI translator was working for the Mossad and that the Mossad also tried to recruit Edmonds to make phony translations for the purpose of misdirecting investigations. When agent Edmonds refused, the Mossad threatened her safety! (
127) When she brought these allegations to the attention of her superiors, she was fired for being “disruptive“. The Washington Post briefly reported this story without mentioning the name of nation that tried to recruit Edmonds. But The Post did reveal that Edmonds and the other translator “trace their ethnicity” to this certain "Middle Eastern" country. (128) Agent Sibel Edmunds is not an Arab. Edmonds is jewish. Therefore we know that the “Middle Eastern” nation which the Post chose not to name is Israel. (No big surprise there!) Sibel Edmonds deserves a lot of credit for defying the Mossad and blowing the whistle to her superiors. Instead, she was fired for her patriotic efforts, proving once again that Zionists are willing to hurt innocent jews.

There is FBI agent John M. Cole, program manager for FBI intelligence investigations covering India, Pakistan, and Afgahinstan. In the same Washington Post story about Edmunds, it was reported that Cole also wrote a letter to FBI chief Mueller warning him about lax security procedures in the hiring of translators. (
129)

Dedicated agents such as Wright, Rowley, Cole, Edmonds and others who have spoken anonymously, had to be stopped from going after “Muslim terrorists”. If not so obstructed, they would in time come to discover that they weren’t really Al Qaeda terrorists!! Not only were investigations blocked before 9-11, but they continue to be blocked after 9-11. The cover up is so blatant that members of both the House and Senate Intelligence committees complains directly to CIA Director George Tenet and Attorney General John Ashcroft. The Los Angeles Times reported:
"Lawmakers leading the investigation of intelligence failures surrounding the 9-11 attacks are increasingly concerned that the CIA and Justice department are actively impeding their efforts....The flare up centers on obstacles congressional investigators say the agencies have strewn in their path." (130 A)

That's exactly what FBI agents Wright, Rowley, Edmunds, and Cole said happened to them when they tried to investigate before the attacks!

By the way, did I mention that the FBI is under the jurisdiction of yet another Zionist named Michael Chertoff? Chertoff is the Director of the Criminal Division of the US Justice Department. FBI chief Mueller has to answer to Chertoff.






{Return to Part 4}
{Return to Part 3}
{Return to Part 2}
{Return to Part 1}
{Go to Part 6}

Saturday, March 5, 2011

U.S. Gov. was running a drill of a plane crashing into Gov. Building on the morning of 9/11 - Operational Cover for the real attacks



This is part of the reason why NORAD did not respond properly to the "hijacked aircraft" on the morning of September 11, 2001, not sending up military interceptor jets immediately....ie, they thought the reports of "hijacked aircraft" were "part of the drill."



Article #1:

Federal agency planned plane-crashing-into-building drill ... last Sept. 11

Associated Press
August 22, 2002

WASHINGTON (AP) — In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident.

[...]
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-08-22-sept-11-plane-drill-_x.htm


A "bizarre coincidence"? Suuuure it was.






Article #2:

Wargames Were Cover For the Operational Execution of 9/11

Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson
September 20 2004


For almost three years since 9/11 independent researchers have stockpiled individual smoking guns which prove that the official version of events was not only a lie but operationally impossible.

However, no single smoking gun has yet been forwarded to explain why air defenses categorically reversed Standard Operating Procedure and failed to respond to hijacked jetliners.

Until now. More and more individuals are looking at the facts and highlighting exercise drills that took place on the morning of 9/11.

It is clear that at least five if not six training exercises were in operation in the days leading up to and on the morning of 9/11. This meant that NORAD radar screens showed as many as 22 hijacked airliners at the same time. NORAD had been briefed that this was part of the exercise drill and therefore normal reactive procedure was forestalled and delayed.

The large numbers of 'blips' on NORAD screens that displayed both real and 'drill' hijacked planes explain why confused press reports emerged hours after the attack stating that up to eight planes had been hijacked.
Click here for that article.

The drill scenario also explains a comment made by air traffic control personnel which was featured in a July 2004 BBC television report.
click here for that video clip and article. The controller is told that a hijacked airliner is heading for New York and responds by saying, "is this real world or an exercise?"

[...]

What were the drills called and what was their nature?

1) OPERATION NORTHERN VIGILANCE: This was planned months in advance of 9/11 and ensured that on the morning of 9/11, jet fighters were removed from patrolling the US east coast and sent to Alaska and Canada, therefore reducing the amount of fighter planes available to protect the east coast.

2) BIOWARFARE EXERCISE TRIPOD II: Alex Jones first reported on this back in May when Rudolph Giuliani let the details of it slip in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission. FEMA arrived in New York on September 10th to set up a command post located at Pier 29 under the auspices of a 'biowarfare exercise scheduled for September 12. This explains why Tom Kenney of FEMA's National Urban Search and Rescue Team, told Dan Rather of CBS News that FEMA had arrived in New York on the night of September 10th. This was originally dismissed as a slip of the tongue. Giuliani was to use this post as a command post on 9/11 after he evacuated WTC Building 7. As we reported back in January, Giuliani knew when to leave WTC 7 because he got advanced warning that the Trade Towers were about to collapse. "We were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse," Rudolph Giuliani told Peter Jennings of ABC News. How did Giuliani know the towers were about to collapse when no steel building in history had previously collapsed from fire damage?

3) OPERATION VIGILANT GUARDIAN: This exercise simulated hijacked planes in the north eastern sector and started to coincide with 9/11. Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, NORAD unit's airborne control and warning officer, was overseeing the exercise. At 8:40am she took a call from Boston Center which said it had a hijacked airliner. Her first words, as quoted by Newhouse News Service were, "It must be part of the exercise." This is another example of how the numerous drills on the morning of 9/11 deliberately distracted NORAD so that the real hijacked planes couldn't be intercepted in time.

4) OPERATION NORTHERN GUARDIAN: The details of this exercise are still scant but it is considered to be part of Vigilant Guardian, relating to simulating hijacked planes in the north eastern sector.

5) OPERATION VIGILANT WARRIOR: This was referenced in Richard Clarke's book 'Against All Enemies'. It is thought to have been the 'attack' component of the Vigilant Guardian exercise.

Another example of how air defenses were purposefully kept preoccupied so they couldn't protect New York was
reported by this website in December of 2003. The Air National Guard's 177th Fighter Wing, based at Atlantic City International Airport in Pomona, were just eight minutes away from New York and could have intercepted both Flight 11 and Flight 175.

Under NORAD procedures that date to the Cold War, two F-16 fighters from the 177th were parked around the clock on the Atlantic City runway. Pilots waited in a nearby building, ready to scramble.

But on the morning of 9/11, the F-16's were performing bombing runs over an empty stretch of the Pine Barrens near Atlantic City after being decommissioned from their usual role of protecting the skies of the east coast.

It was only after both trade towers were hit that the two F-16s landed and were refitted with air-to-air missiles, then sent aloft.

[...]
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2004/080904wargamescover.htm

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says a "missile" hit the Pentagon






Secretary Rumsfeld Interview with Parade Magazine

(Interview with Lyric Wallwork Winik, Parade Magazine)

[...]

Q: This is a question that's been asked by many Americans, but especially by the widows of September 11th. How were we so asleep at the switch? How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?

Rumsfeld: There were lots of warnings. The intelligence information that we get, it sometimes runs into the hundreds of alerts or pieces of intelligence a week. One looks at the worldwide, it's thousands. And the task is to sort through it and see what you can find. And as you find things, the law enforcement officials who have the responsibility to deal with that type of thing -- the FBI at the federal level, and although it is not, it's an investigative service as opposed to a police force, it's not a federal police force, as you know. But the state and local law enforcement officials have the responsibility for dealing with those kinds of issues.

They [find a lot] and any number of terrorist efforts have been dissuaded, deterred or stopped by good intelligence gathering and good preventive work. It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.

[...]


source: http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3845

(see second question and answer at above link for above quote)






Other Articles of Interest:

- Pentagon Attack - Evidence does not support the "official" story of a Boeing 757 Crash
- Hani Hanjour: A poor pilot who could not have possibly flown a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon per kosher "official" story

Hani Hanjour: A poor pilot who could not have possibly flown a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon per kosher "official" story



Hani Hanjour




Article #1:

A Trainee Noted for Incompetence

By JIM YARDLEY
Published: May 4, 2002

New York Times

Although the authorities say none of the 19 hijackers on Sept. 11 were tied to an F.B.I. intelligence alert issued by an agent in Arizona two months earlier, one hijacker, Hani Hanjour, had come to the Federal Aviation Administration's attention earlier last year, when he trained in Phoenix.

Mr. Hanjour, who investigators contend piloted the airliner that crashed into the Pentagon, was reported to the aviation agency in February 2001 after instructors at his flight school in Phoenix had found his piloting skills so shoddy and his grasp of English so inadequate that they questioned whether his pilot's license was genuine.

Records show a Hani Hanjour obtained a license in 1999 in Scottsdale, Ariz. Previous and sometimes contradictory reports said he failed in 1996 and 1997 to obtain a license at other schools.

''The staff thought he was a very nice guy, but they didn't think his English was up to level,'' said Marilyn Ladner, a vice president at the Pan Am International Flight Academy, which operated the center in Phoenix. Ms. Ladner said that the F.A.A. examined Mr. Hanjour's credentials and found them legitimate and that an inspector, by coincidence, attended a class with Mr. Hanjour. The inspector also offered to find an interpreter to help Mr. Hanjour, she said.

''He ended up observing Hani in class,'' Ms. Ladner added, ''though that was not his original reason for being there.''

Company officials briefed members of Congress about the case, including Representative James L. Oberstar, Democrat of Minnesota, who made public some of its general details in December.

The aviation agency did not return a call for comment.

Pan Am International, one of the largest pilot schools in the nation, also operated the flight school in Eagan, Minn., near Minneapolis, where the instructors' suspicions led to the arrest of Zacarias Moussaoui, the man whom the authorities have said was intended to be the 20th hijacker.

Ms. Ladner said the Phoenix staff never suspected that Mr. Hanjour was a hijacker but feared that his skills were so weak that he could pose a safety hazard if he flew a commercial airliner.

''There was no suspicion as far as evildoing,'' Ms. Ladner said. ''It was more of a very typical instructional concern that 'you really shouldn't be in the air.' ''

A former employee of the school said that the staff initially made good-faith efforts to help Mr. Hanjour and that he received individual instruction for a few days. But he was a poor student. On one written problem that usually takes 20 minutes to complete, Mr. Hanjour took three hours, the former employee said, and he answered incorrectly.

Ultimately, administrators at the school told Mr. Hanjour that he would not qualify for the advanced certificate. But the ex-employee said Mr. Hanjour continued to pay to train on a simulator for Boeing 737 jets. ''He didn't care about the fact that he couldn't get through the course,'' the ex-employee said.

Staff members characterized Mr. Hanjour as polite, meek and very quiet. But most of all, the former employee said, they considered him a very bad pilot.

''I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon,'' the former employee said. ''He could not fly at all.''


Photo: Hani Hanjour, who did not do well at flight school in Phoenix. (Agence France-Presse)
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20A11FD35550C778CDDAC0894DA404482





Article #2:

FAA Was Alerted To Sept. 11 Hijacker

Pilot's Poor English Skills Raised Concerns At Flight School


WASHINGTON, May 10, 2002
By David Hancock

(CBS) Months before Hani Hanjour is believed to have flown an American Airlines jet into the Pentagon, managers at an Arizona flight school reported him at least five times to the FAA, reports CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales.

They reported him not because they feared he was a terrorist, but because his English and flying skills were so bad, they told the Associated Press, they didn't think he should keep his pilot's license.

"I couldn't believe he had a commercial license of any kind with the skills that he had," said Peggy Chevrette, the manager for the now-defunct JetTech flight school in Phoenix
.

[...]
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml






Article #3:

On Flight 77: 'Our Plane Is Being Hijacked'

By Marc Fisher and Don Phillips
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, September 12, 2001; Page A01

[...]

But just as the plane seemed to be on a suicide mission into the White House, the unidentified pilot executed a pivot so tight that it reminded observers of a fighter jet maneuver. The plane circled 270 degrees to the right to approach the Pentagon from the west, whereupon Flight 77 fell below radar level, vanishing from controllers' screens, the sources said.

[...]

Aviation sources said the plane was flown with extraordinary skill, making it highly likely that a trained pilot was at the helm, possibly one of the hijackers. Someone even knew how to turn off the transponder, a move that is considerably less than obvious.

[...]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14365-2001Sep11





So...we are expected to believe that Hanjour, who we know was a poor pilot and lacked the skills to even have a pilot's license, flew a Boeing 757 "with extraordinary skill" reminding aviation sources of a "fighter jet maneuver"?






Further Resources:
- "Hani Hanjour: 9/11 Pilot Extraordinaire" (whatreallyhappened.com)
- Former Vietnam Combat and Commericail Pilot Russ Wittenberg Says 'No Way' Could a Novice Fly a 757 into Pentagon according to "official" story





Other Articles of Interest:

- Pentagon Attack - Evidence does not support the "official" story of a Boeing 757 Crash
- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says a "missile" hit the Pentagon

Pentagon Attack - Evidence does not support the "official" story of a Boeing 757 Crash




This a photo of the Pentagon immediately after the supposed impact of a Boeing 757 airliner. The damage to the facade of the building (as demonstrated by this photo and others) does not show large holes where the fuselage or wings penetrated the building (as at the twin towers). Nor is there any aircraft debris to speak of in front of the building, which you would expect if the plane did not penetrate the building.



The Pentagon attack is less clear than many other aspects about 9/11. It is hard to know what exactly happened, because the government is withholding almost all of the evidence related to the event. But, in my opinion, the evidence does not support the claim that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon. The physical evidence I have seen in regards to the damage and wreckage at the Pentagon tends to not support the official story. The damage to the Pentagon is not consistent with a Boeing 757 hit and there was little to no identifiable wreckage of a 757 present. Additionally, Hani Hanjour, the supposed pilot that allegedly flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, was actually a very poor pilot. There is no way he could even fly a Boeing 757, let alone fly it in the manner as claimed by the government, flying low to the ground and making sharp turns and a rapid decent. We know from mainstream sources that the aircraft that hit the Pentagon made a difficult manuever in the approach to the Pentagon that only a very experienced pilot could have made. One FAA official said he thought it was a "military plane" based on the manuever in the approach to the Pentagon.

Government confiscates surveillance tapes and release puzzling tape purporting to show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon:

Shortly after the attack, government agents seized video surveillance tapes from a nearby gas station and hotel that captured whatever type of aircraft hit the Pentagon. These tapes have not been released. Why, and what are they hiding?

The tapes that the government released portions of a video tape purporting to show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon do not show anything resembling a Boeing 757, but show a much smaller aircraft. Here is that video tape:

Photobucket

Do you see a Boeing 757 in that tape? I sure don’t.



Further Resources:
- Pentagon Strike flash video (A good short analysis of the Pentagon attack)
- Serendipity: "The Attack on The Pentagon"
- 911 Research: "Pentagon Attack Photos"





Other Articles of Interest:

- Hani Hanjour: A poor pilot who could not have possibly flown a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon per kosher "official" story
- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld says a "missile" hit the Pentagon

STRANGER THAN FICTION: An Independent Investigation of the True Culprits Behind 9-11 {Part 4}



{Return to Part 3}
{Return to Part 2}
{Return to Part 1}





WHO PROVIDED THE PROTECTIVE COVER FOR THE 9-11 OPERATION?

On October 26, 1999, the famous golfer Payne Stewart boarded a private Learjet in Florida and left for Texas. Shortly after takeoff, Stewart's jet veered sharply off course and began heading northwest. All contact with air controllers was lost. Within 15 minutes of having gone off course, US fighter jets had already intercepted the jet. Everyone on board was likely dead due to depressurization. These fighter jets were dispatched by NORAD, the branch of the US air force whose job it is to monitor and defend US airspace 24 hours a day. NORAD maintains a huge array of land based radar systems and has fighter jets on alert 24 hours a day so that they can respond to a crisis. The jets escorted the doomed airplane until another group of Air National Guard jets took over the escort mission. Finally, Stewart's jet ran out of fuel a crashed in South Dakota. The quick reaction time and military precision with which NORAD intercepted and escorted Stewart's jet was impressive, and exactly what one would have expected from the greatest military power in world history. (
86)

But on 9-11, the same NORAD which had so effortlessly intercepted Stewart's jet in 1999, was nowhere to be found during that two hour period between the first planes going off course and the last one crashing in a Pennsylvania field. How is it possible that the airspace between Boston and Washington DC, an area which contains the political and economic heart of the nation, was left completely defenseless? The second plane to hit the New York had flown off course without communication for 40 minutes. On its way to New York, it actually flew within a few miles of McGuire Air Force base in New Jersey, after the first tower had already been hit! And how is it possible that Washington DC was left undefended (long after the New York attacks) when Andrews Air Force base is within car driving distance? The air force jets which did finally arrive were too late. Was this due to NORAD's incompetence, or was the order to scramble the fighter jets deliberately delayed so that the terror attacks could take place. Given NORAD's impressive performance in the 1999 Payne Stewart disaster, this would suggest that someone high up in the Air Force establishment may have issued stand down orders to some of our Air Force bases. Remember, the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board is headed by Zionist Richard Perle and his gang of warmongering lackeys. (
87) The civilians on this board wield the power to promote career minded Generals and Admirals. Is it really that hard to believe that a highly placed military leader could have collaborated with the true 9-11 planners?

What makes the Air Force's slow response even more outrageous and suspicious is that previously mentioned Newsweek article which revealed that several Pentagon leaders (Defense Policy Board?) cancelled flight plans for September 11 due to security concerns. (
88) There were other warning signals too which we’re reviewed earlier. In light of all these warnings, why wasn’t NORAD and it's armada of fighters placed on an even higher alert than they already are? There is only one logical answer to these questions: Certain Pentagon leaders were "in on it".

Some high level Intelligence officials around the world have come to the same conclusion. General Hamid Gul, a former Director of Pakistani Intelligence appears to have hit the nail on the head with his analysis:
“The attacks against New York and Washington were Israeli engineered…”

"The attacks started at 8:45, and four flights are diverted from their assigned air space and no Air Force fighter jets scramble until 10:00. Radars are jammed, transponders fail and no IFF - friend or foe identification - challenge. In Pakistan, if there is no response to an IFF, jets are instantly scrambled. This was clearly an inside job. Will this also be hushed up in the investigation, like the Kennedy assassination?" (
89 A)
The German newspaper, Der Tagesspiegel, interviewed Andreas von Bulow, the former head of the parliamentary commission that oversees Germany’s secret services. Von Bulow stated:
“The planning of the attacks was technically and organizationally a master achievement—to hijack four huge airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their targets, with complicated flight maneuvers,” said von Bülow in the Tagesspiegel interview. “This is unthinkable, without years of support from state intelligence services.” (89 B)
This led the interviewer to call Von Bulow “a conspiracy theorist.” To which Von Bulow responded:

“Yeah, yeah. That’s the ridicule from those who prefer to follow the official, politically correct line,” von Bulow responded. “Even investigative journalists are fed propaganda and disinformation. Anyone who doubts the official line is called crazy.”

“With the help of the horrifying attacks, the Western mass democracies are being subjected to brainwashing. The enemy image of anti-communism doesn’t work anymore; it is to be replaced by peoples of Islamic belief. They are accused of having given birth to suicidal terrorism.”
(
89 C)
Both Hamid Gul and Andreas Von Bulow accuse Israel’s Mossad and elements within the US of being responsible for 9-11. These charges drew this response from George Bush, who said before the United Nations in November of 2001:
"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th - malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty." (89 D)
Bush understandably has no tolerance for “conspiracy theories” but too many unanswered questions still arise. Surely the masterminds of the 9-11 operation would have taken the time to learn something about US air defense procedures. They would therefore have realized that hitting New York City with jets hijacked from Boston would have been difficult. New York is about 30 minutes away by airplane and jumbo jets fly very slowly when compared to US fighter jets crack the sound barrier. Even with a 15-20 minute head start, NORAD's jets could have easily intercepted them, especially the second plane, which took a longer route to New York and flew way off course for 40 minutes. Why choose Boston's airport and jeopardize the success of the operation? Wouldn't it be safer to just hijack planes from New York's Kennedy or La Guardia Airports? Or even Newark which is just across the river. Any plane hijacked from either of those three busy airports would have been unstoppable. Even a plane from Philadelphia's Airport would have been much closer to the target than far away Boston.

The planners were no dummies. They must have counted on receiving protective cover and a window of opportunity by someone high up at US Air command. Why else choose Boston? In addition to the protection that the planners were to receive from certain Air Force elements, there is another plausible theory for choosing Boston's Logan Airport as well as United and American Airlines planes. It should be noted that the firm which provides security at Boston's Logan Airport and also Newark Airport, and also works extensively with United and American Airlines, is a company called Huntleigh USA. (
90) Claiming that Huntleigh USA's airport security was grossly negligent on 9-11, family members of some of the victims are suing Huntleigh. (91)

Huntleigh USA had been acquired by ICTS International in 1999. ICTS is controlled by two Israelis; Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon. (
92) In short, security at Boston's Logan airport was handled (or mishandled) by an Israeli controlled company. Is there a connection here? Could agents have been infiltrated into Logan Airport under Israeli owned Huntleigh's cover? It's quite possible. In the days following the 9-11 attacks, Israeli security professionals began aggressively marketing themselves in order to gain more airport security jobs. (93) Americans should be grateful to have such wonderful allies who care about our airport security so much!

Could some of the failure of our defense systems be attributed to a cyber attack from computer hackers? Our defense and intelligence systems are very dependent upon technology. A well coordinated attack on these systems may also have contributed to our inability to expose and prevent the attacks. There is one group that has the capability to attack our military computer systems.

In July of 1999, Ha’aretz (Israel) ran a story headlined: “Hackers Using Israeli Net Site to Strike at Pentagon”: Ha’aretz reported:
“An Israeli Internet site is being used by international computer hackers as a base for electronic attacks on US government and military computer systems, according to Pentagon officials who were quoted in a Washington Times report yesterday.”

“According to the Times, the real danger to US national security is the threat posed by foreign intelligence services or governments that could launch electronic warfare against the United States”
(
94)
And look what the US Department of Justice wrote in this 1998 press release:
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Department of Justice, in conjunction with the FBI, the Air Force Office of Special Investigation, the National Aeronautic and Space Administration and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, announced today that the Israeli National Police arrested Ehud Tenebaum, an Israeli citizen, for illegally accessing computers belonging to the Israeli and United States governments, as well as hundreds of other commercial and educational systems in the United States and elsewhere. (95)
No doubt about it. Covert elements in Israel have been targeting the US military’s defense systems for some time now. This could very well have been yet another instrument played during the great orchestrated concert of 9-11.



LEFT: BUSH: "LET US NEVER TOLERATE OUTRAGEOUS CONSPIRACY THEORIES."
RIGHT: GENERAL HAMID GUL: "CLEARLY AN INSIDE JOB."




THE CURIOUS COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS AND WTC #7

The government/media approved version of events insists that the fires in the World Trade Center burned so hot that they caused steel supports to melt and buckle, thus triggering a total collapse of the towers and also WTC #7 (which was never even hit by a plane!). This is a strange theory for a number of reasons:
1. The architects who designed the World Trade Center designed it to withstand the direct impact and fuel fire of a commercial airline crash. Aaron Swirsky, one of the architects of the WTC described the collapse as "incredible" and "unbelievable." (96) Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer said: "I designed it for a 707 to hit it. The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity comparable to the 767." (97)

2. The history of high-rise building fires provides no case histories of buildings collapsing due to steel beams melting from a fire.

3. The total collapse of WTC 1, WTC 2, AND WTC 7 (which was never even hit by a plane!) were all perfectly symmetrical and methodical. The three straight down collapses were all identical in appearance to well engineered, controlled implosions.
A demolition company could not have done it better. Now that we know that all one has to do to bring a tall building straight down is set a fuel fire in it, the well trained experts who work for demolition companies should all be out of a job by now!

Even a layman with no explosives background should be able to see this. But many specialists in the explosives and structural engineering have also made this observation and commented on these inconsistencies. After the WTC collapse, the Vice President of New Mexico Tech, Van Romero, gave an interview to the Albuquerque Journal. He stated plainly that he believed that the WTC collapse was too methodical and that explosive devices must have been placed in key points of both buildings. Romero said:
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that. It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points. One of the things that terrorists are noted for is a diversionary attack and a secondary device." (98)
In that same interview, Romero revealed that he was in Washington DC when the attacks took place. He and a colleague were there to discuss defense research programs for New Mexico Tech. A few days after his interview, Romero abruptly changed his opinion and told the Albuquerque Journal that he no longer believed that bombs brought down the towers. (99) Romero, who relies upon the Zionist occupied Pentagon for funding, hadsuddenly flip-flopped and joined the "melted steel" theorists.

There is more than just my own common sense and Romero's expert opinion to support the belief that the towers were imploded from within. Several witnesses and survivors reported hearing bombs going off inside the World Trade Center. Louie Cacchioli is a firefighter with Engine 47 in Harlem, New York. Cacchioli told People Magazine the following:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building." (100)
Now this whole controversy between the "melted steel" scenario and the detonation scenario is one that could be very easily resolved. All we have to do is dig up the steel beams and examine each and everyone of them. If an explosive device caused the steel to fail, there will be tell-tale indications for the engineers to see. But if it was intense heat that caused the steel to "melt" or “buckle“, there will be tell-tale signs of that as well. All we have to do to put an end to this controversy is to closely examine the steel. Right?

Well, don't hold your breath. That's never going to happen. Thanks in large part to Time Magazine's "Person of the Year 2001", New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the steel beams were quickly recycled before investigators even had the chance to look at them! A media darling and lifelong supporter of Israel, Saint Rudy Giuliani made sure that all of the "smoking gun" evidence was destroyed and right quick too. Much of the steel was recycled in America, but an additional seventy thousand tons of WTC steel was sold to Metals Management - a New York company with a jewish (Zionist?) president named Alan Ratner. Ratner then turned around and shipped the WTC’s steel to China and India for recycling! (
101)

China Radio International’s English Edition also reported:
“New York's Metals Management is among the firms taking steel from the huge project to clear Ground Zero. The company says it has bought 70,000 tons of scrap from the ruined twin towers. Some of the scrap has been shipped across the Pacific to Asian, including China and India. Among the consignments of scrap are the "very dense" steel girders from Ground Zero, which could finally yield 250,000 to 400,000 tons of scrap for recycling.” (102) (emphasis added)
Imagine that! The largest criminal investigation in history and the investigators weren't even permitted to see the most important evidence of all - the steel! During the whole time that Saint Rudy the Recycler and Ratner the Rat were destroying evidence, many of the most respected engineers in the country openly complained not only about the recycling, but also about the Federal government's suffocating control of their investigation.

On December 25, 2001, the New York Times ran a story about the frustrations of some of the engineers who were called in to study the cause of the collapse:
“Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which includes some of the nation's most respected engineers, also uncovered complaints that they had at various times been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster site and requesting crucial information like recorded distress calls to the police and fire departments..." (103)
They made their concerns known publicly. Bill Manning, editor of the 125 year old Fire Engineering magazine, noticed a strange difference between the WTC investigation and other major fire investigations in New York City’s past. Manning wrote:
"Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the happy land social club fire?...That's what they're doing at the World Trade Center. The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately." (104)
One investigator told the New York Times:
"This is almost the dream team of engineers in the country working on this, and our hands are tied," said one team member who asked not to be identified. Members have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press. "FEMA is controlling everything," the team member said. (105)
Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer from the Fire Engineering department at the University of Maryland told the New York Times:
"I find the speed with which important evidence has been removed and recycled to be appalling." (106)
Finally, the Times story made this interesting little revelation about St. Rudy the Recycler:
Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written and oral requests for comment over a three- day period about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation.. (107)
It is a very odd form of science that the government and some of its house scientists practice these days. Without a shred of physical evidence, these modern-day alchemists have been able to "prove" their theory fire caused the towers to collapse. This appears to be yet another monstrous lie. Why else would you destroy the "melted steel"? Ask Rudy.



LEFT; EXPLOSIVES EXPERT VAN ROMERO: "THE COLLAPSE WAS TOO METHODICAL."
RIGHT: SAINT RUDY THE RECYCLER AT A PRO-ISRAEL RALLY. HE WAS ALSO NAMED "MAN OF THE YEAR" BY ZIONIST CONTROLLED TIME MAGAZINE.





{Return to Part 3}
{Return to Part 2}
{Return to Part 1}
{Go to Part 5}