Four months before the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. military already had prepared a battle plan for Afghanistan:
Defence redefined means securing cheap energy
December 26 2002
Sydney Morning Herald
As far back as 1975, Henry Kissinger, then secretary of state, said America was prepared to wage war over oil. Separate plans advocating US conquest of Saudi oilfields were published in the '70s. So it should come as little surprise that in May last year - four months before the terrorist attacks on Washington and New York - a battle plan for Afghanistan was already being reviewed by the US Command that would carry it out after September 11. Military strategists were highlighting the energy wealth of the Caspian Sea and Central Asia and its importance to America's "security"."
The Zionists, Israelis, and neo-con warhawks with enormous influence over our government are using the U.S. military to fight wars that advance their agenda of global domination and control. The "neo-conservative" think tank "The Project for the New American Century" admits this:
"Established in the spring of 1997, the Project for the New American Century is a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership."
PNAC Statement of Principles:
"As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world's preeminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?
America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership."
Hmmmm. We need to "shape circumstances" in the Middle East and Asia to be favorable to American interests in order for "American global leadership." All of this is for good purposes, of course. It's for "peace" and "security" and good stuff like that. Just like the Iraq war was "for peace" and "for our security." "Freedom is on the march." They're not lying. Really. And yes, technically it is American (really Jewish-Zionist New World Order) global domination. But don't call it that. Just call it "global leadership."
PNAC saw that a “crisis” was needed in order to provide the pretext for the wars they were planing. The PNAC document titled Rebuilding America’s Defences: Strategy, Forces and Resrouces For a New Century (published in September 2000) stated that a “catastrophic and catalyzing event–like a new Pearl Harbor” was needed:
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."
-"Rebuilding America’s Defences: Strategy, Forces and Resrouces For a New Century", page 51
(see top of page 51 of pdf document above...page 63 of 90 in display)
They got their "catastrophic and catalyzing event" just a year later on September 11th, 2001. Coincidence?